enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 'Alarming' vs 'narrow': Senate split on Supreme Court ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/alarming-vs-narrow-senate-split...

    Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., listens to witness testimony during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on "Supreme Court Ethics Reform" on Capitol Hill in Washington, on May 2, 2023.

  3. Death row inmate will not testify to House panel amid battle ...

    www.aol.com/gov-abbott-urges-texas-supreme...

    Just hours before the hearing began, Gov. Greg Abbott in a court filing early Monday morning asked the Texas Supreme Court to throw out House lawmakers' subpoena of the death row inmate, breaking ...

  4. Diaz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaz_v._United_States

    Diaz was convicted and sentenced to seven years in prison. On appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the Court rejected petitioner's argument that Agent Flood's testimony violated rule 704(b). The Court ruled that Flood's statements did not constitute an "explicit opinion" on the defendant's state of mind. [4]

  5. Trammel v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trammel_v._United_States

    The Court modified the Hawkins rule so that the witness-spouse alone has a privilege to refuse to testify adversely; the witness may be neither compelled to testify nor foreclosed from testifying. Court membership; Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Associate Justices William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart Byron White · Thurgood Marshall

  6. Supreme Court weighs testimony from witness 'exposed as a ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-hears-oklahoma-death...

    The Supreme Court weighs whether inmate Richard Glossip's murder conviction should be thrown out — an unusual death penalty case in which the attorney general of Oklahoma has sided with a defendant.

  7. Giglio v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giglio_v._United_States

    Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the prosecution's failure to inform the jury that a witness had been promised not to be prosecuted in exchange for his testimony was a failure to fulfill the duty to present all material evidence to the jury, and constituted a violation of due process, requiring a new trial. [1]

  8. Robert Roberson expected to testify before legislative panel ...

    www.aol.com/robert-roberson-expected-testify...

    The U.S. Supreme Court Thursday evening also denied a request to stay the execution, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor writing in her ruling that the "Supreme Court is powerless to act without a ...

  9. Davis v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._Washington

    Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States and written by Justice Antonin Scalia that established the test used to determine whether a hearsay statement is "testimonial" for Confrontation Clause purposes.