Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Therefore, it is not useful to be pedantic and add minor or overly technical aspects of a definition to the lead. The lead should instead give a good enough definition in the first sentence to be readable by everyone and then try to elaborate on it in the rest of the lead. It is best to explain the importance of a good lead section with an example.
The name or names given in the first sentence does not always match the article title. This page gives advice on the contents of the first sentence, not the article title. By the design of Wikipedia's software, an article can have only one title. When this title is a name, significant alternative names for the topic should be mentioned in the ...
An article entitled "Use of chromatic scales in early Baroque music" is likely to be read by musicians, and technical details and terms are appropriate, linking to articles explaining the technical terms. On the other hand, an article entitled "Baroque music" is likely to be read by laypersons who want a brief and plainly written overview, with ...
Without looking at the history of the article, one cannot be certain that all three sentences were inserted by the same author, using the same source. What if they were written by editor A, and editor B came along later, adding a new, relevant, referenced sentence, but with the ref for the third sentence only?
For example, instead of saying "Method X is the best one" say, instead: "Method X improves results". Use language similar to what you would use in a conversation. Many people use more technical language when writing articles and speaking at conferences, but try to use more understandable prose in conversation.
Any one article should use a consistent approach throughout. Most captions are not complete sentences, but merely sentence fragments, which should not end with a period or full stop. If any complete sentence occurs in a caption, then all sentences, and any sentence fragments, in that caption should end with a period or full stop.
Is of an appropriate length; it is long enough to provide sufficient information, depth, and analysis on its subject, without including unnecessary detail or information that would be more suitable in "sub-articles," related articles, or Wikimedia sister projects.
An article suffering from such language should be rewritten to correct the problem or, if an editor is unsure how best to make a correction, the article may be tagged with an appropriate template, such as {{Peacock term}}. Puffery is an example of positively loaded language; negatively loaded language should be avoided just as much. People ...