Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, 597 U.S. 629 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to McGirt v. Oklahoma, decided in 2020.In McGirt, the Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Congress never properly disestablished the Indian reservations of the Five Civilized Tribes in Oklahoma when granting its statehood, and thus almost half the state was still considered to be Native American land.
Herrera v. Wyoming, No. 17-532, 587 U.S. 329 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Wyoming's statehood did not void the Crow Tribe's right to hunt on "unoccupied lands of the United States" under an 1868 treaty, and that the Bighorn National Forest did not automatically become "occupied" when the forest was created.
The state of New Mexico also has hunting and fishing regulations. [1] The two sets of regulations are often in conflict as regards the hunting seasons, bag limits, and the fact that the tribe does not require a state license to hunt tribal lands, regardless of whether the individual is an Indian or non-Indian.
Bipartisan group of senators is proposing new ethics rules for high court, Josh Marcus writes Yachts, $10m payouts and secret hunting trips: The Supreme Court’s long history of ethics scandals ...
Bonta, 141 S.Ct. 2373 (2021), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the disclosure of donors to non-profit organizations. The case challenged California's requirement that non-profit organizations disclose the identity of their donors to the state's Attorney General as a precondition of soliciting donations in the state.
The Supreme Court on Monday adopted its first code of ethics, in the face of sustained criticism over undisclosed trips and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some justices, but the code lacks a ...
The ruling was a victory for conservative groups, which argued that a disclosure law in California violated their First Amendment rights and exposed top donors to potential intimidation or attack.
The decision contradicted the decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. [46] On October 9, 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal and granted certiorari (a writ to the lower court to send the case to them for review) to resolve the conflict between the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the federal Court of Claims. [47]