enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lawrence v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas

    Lawrence v. Texas , 539 U.S. 558 (2003), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws criminalizing sodomy between consenting adults are unconstitutional .

  3. Portal:Law/Selected cases/22 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Law/Selected_cases/22

    Lawrence and Garner were charged with a misdemeanor under Texas' anti-sodomy law; both pleaded no contest and received a fine. Assisted by the American civil rights organization Lambda Legal , Lawrence and Garner appealed their sentences to the Texas Courts of Appeals , which ruled in 2000 that the sodomy law was unconstitutional.

  4. Chuck Rosenthal (district attorney) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Rosenthal_(district...

    On March 26, 2003, he argued before the Supreme Court of the United States in Lawrence v. Texas that laws against sodomy are constitutional. The Court disagreed, holding 6-3 that prosecutions for private sexual conduct violates the United States Constitution. [5]

  5. Bowers v. Hardwick - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowers_v._Hardwick

    Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld, in a 5–4 ruling, the constitutionality of a Georgia sodomy law criminalizing oral and anal sex in private between consenting adults, in this case with respect to homosexual sodomy, though the law did not differentiate between homosexual and heterosexual sodomy. [1]

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 539

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided Beneficial Nat'l Bank v. Anderson: 539 U.S. 1: 2003: Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. 539 U.S. 23: 2003

  7. Jennifer Lawrence-Produced Reproductive Rights Doc ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/entertainment/jennifer-lawrence...

    “Zurawski v Texas,” a reproductive rights documentary which unfolds like a legal thriller, has found a streaming home in indie service Jolt. The nonfiction work is currently available to ...

  8. LGBTQ rights in Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_Texas

    Until the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2003 declared sodomy laws unconstitutional in Lawrence v. Texas, sodomy was a criminal offense in Texas, termed "deviate sexual intercourse". [6] [7] As of 2023, Texas is one of the three states whose dormant sodomy laws only apply to same-sex sexual acts, alongside Kentucky and Kansas.

  9. Paul M. Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_M._Smith

    Paul March Smith (born 1955) is an American attorney who has argued many important cases, most notably Lawrence v. Texas and has argued 21 cases before the Supreme Court of the United States . In January 2017, he joined the faculty at Georgetown University Law Center , and also the Campaign Legal Center in Washington, D.C. , as Vice President ...