enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: ohio unlawful vehicle use form california 1 5

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Aggressive panhandling - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggressive_panhandling

    In general, aggressive panhandling is a solicitation made in person for immediate donation of money or other gratuity. This may be done by vocal appeal (asking, requesting, coercing (badgering), sympathy appeals, harassment, threats, or demands) or by nonvocal appeal (usage of signs or other signals gestures, postures, children, animals, or props such as toys and musical instruments).

  3. Brendlin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendlin_v._California

    California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that all occupants of a car are "seized" for purposes of the Fourth Amendment during a traffic stop, not just the driver.

  4. Reckless driving - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reckless_driving

    If, while violating the provisions of subsections 1 to 5, inclusive, of NRS 484B.270, NRS 484B.280, paragraph (a) or (c) of subsection 1 of NRS 484B.283, NRS 484B.350, subsection 1 or 2 of NRS 484B.363 or subsection 1 of NRS 484B.600, the driver of a motor vehicle is the proximate cause of a collision with a pedestrian or a person riding a ...

  5. Taking without owner's consent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taking_without_owner's_consent

    It is committed if a person commits an offence under section 12(1) of the Theft Act 1968 in relation to a mechanically propelled vehicle and it is proved that at any time after the vehicle was unlawfully taken (whether by that person or another) and before it was recovered, the vehicle was driven, or death, injury or damage was caused, in one ...

  6. Ohio v. Robinette - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_v._Robinette

    Ohio v. Robinette , 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car .

  7. Law of Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Ohio

    A maximum 900 copies of the Laws of Ohio are published and distributed by the Ohio Secretary of State; there are no commercial publications other than a microfiche republication of the printed volumes. [5] The Ohio Revised Code is not officially printed, but there are several unofficial but certified (by the Ohio Secretary of State) commercial ...

  8. More than 800 people have lost their lives in jail since July 13, 2015 but few details are publicly released. Huffington Post is compiling a database of every person who died until July 13, 2016 to shed light on how they passed.

  9. California v. Acevedo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Acevedo

    California v. Acevedo , 500 U.S. 565 (1991), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court , which interpreted the Carroll doctrine to provide one rule to govern all automobile searches. The Court stated, "The police may search an automobile and the containers within it where they have probable cause to believe contraband or evidence is ...

  1. Ad

    related to: ohio unlawful vehicle use form california 1 5