Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Under common law, false pretense is defined as a representation of a present or past fact, which the thief knows to be false, and which he intends will and does cause the victim to pass title of his property. That is, false pretense is the acquisition of title from a victim by fraud or misrepresentation of a material past or present fact.
The requisite elements of perhaps the most general form of criminal fraud, theft by false pretense, are the intentional deception of a victim by false representation or pretense with the intent of persuading the victim to part with property and with the victim parting with property in reliance on the representation or pretense and with the ...
Smith, J. C. Obtaining Cheques by Deception or Theft (1997) CLR 396 Smith, J. C. : Stealing Tickets (1998) CLR 723 ^ This offence is referred to as "obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception" by the marginal notes to section 16 of the 1968 and 1969 Acts and by Archbold Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice , 1999, para. 21-216 at p. 1809 ...
Mail fraud was first defined in the United States in 1872. 18 U.S.C. § 1341 provides: Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use ...
AOL latest headlines, entertainment, sports, articles for business, health and world news.
The term applies to actions that employ a scheme or artifice, as opposed to bank robbery or theft. Bankruptcy – concealment of assets by a debtor to avoid liquidation in bankruptcy proceedings; may include filing of false information, or multiple filings in different jurisdictions. [6] Benefits (U.K.) Billing; Bride
Amanda Leeann Porter, 44, is facing identity theft, grand theft, and false impersonation charges Fake nurse oversaw dozens of patients at multiple hospitals, investigators say Skip to main content
The offence of obtaining a money transfer by deception, contrary to section 15A of the Theft Act 1968, was specifically enacted to remove the problem caused by R v Preddy and Slade, R v Dhillon. [10] This case held that there no section 15 offence was committed when the defendant caused transfers between the victim's and his own bank account by ...