Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
By September 2017, PLOS One confirmed they had published over 200,000 articles. [16] By November 2017, the journal Scientific Reports overtook PLOS One in terms of output. [17] [18] At PLOS One, the median review time has grown from 37 days to 125 days over the first ten years of operation, according to Himmelstein's analysis, done for Nature ...
This is a list of open-access journals by field. The list contains notable journals which have a policy of full open access. It does not include delayed open access journals, hybrid open access journals, or related collections or indexing services. True open-access journals can be split into two categories:
The following is a partial list of scientific journals. There are thousands of scientific journals in publication, and many more have been published at various points in the past. The list given here is far from exhaustive, only containing some of the most influential, currently publishing journals in each field.
The Australian Political Studies Association (APSA) ranked academic publishers in 2007, taking into consideration both book and journal publication. [12] By 2022 this was replaced by a ranking of journal titles only. [13] In 2007, their top-ranked (A+) publishers were: Cambridge University Press; University of Chicago Press; Columbia University ...
It was founded in 2000 and launched its first journal, PLOS Biology, in October 2003. As of 2024, PLOS publishes 14 academic journals, [2] including 7 journals indexed within the Science Citation Index Expanded, and consequently 7 journals ranked with an impact factor. PLOS journals are included in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
The journal was established in 2011. [1] The journal states that their aim is to assess solely the scientific validity of a submitted paper, rather than its perceived importance, significance, or impact. [2] In September 2016, the journal became the largest in the world by number of articles, overtaking PLOS ONE. [3] [4] [5]
Negative consequences of rankings are generally well-documented and relate to the performativity of using journal rankings for performance measurement purposes. [20] [21] Studies of methodological quality and reliability have found that "reliability of published research works in several fields may be decreasing with increasing journal rank", [22] contrary to widespread expectations.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association; Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology; Journal of Biomedical Informatics; Journal of Computational Biology; Journal of Mathematical Biology; Journal of Theoretical Biology; PLOS Computational Biology; Source Code for Biology and Medicine