enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. DeVillier v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devillier_v._Texas

    DeVillier v. Texas, 601 U.S. 285 (2024), was a case that the Supreme Court of the United States decided on April 16, 2024. [1] [2] The case dealt with the Supreme Court's takings clause jurisprudence. Because the case touched on whether or not the 5th Amendment is self-executing, the case had implications for Trump v.

  3. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Writing for a unanimous California Supreme Court, Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye affirmed the Court of Appeal’s order regarding class certification. [4] In so holding, the Court first found that the “suffer or permit to work” standard was the appropriate one for determining whether particular workers are employees within the definition of ...

  4. Laidlaw v. Organ - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laidlaw_v._Organ

    However, the Court also thought the judge erred in directing the jury to find for the plaintiff. The question of whether Organ had imposed upon Girault to Laidlaw's detriment was a question of fact to be decided by the jury. For that reason, the Court vacated the verdict and directed retrial before a new jury—venire facias de novo.

  5. City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Austin_v._Reagan...

    The case was first filed in a state district court before the city moved it to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in 2017. [2] The district court selected to review the matter under intermediate scrutiny based on Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego, rather than the strict scrutiny content-based standard of Reed v. Town ...

  6. Spotify layoffs and the Supreme Court reviews Sackler family ...

    www.aol.com/news/spotify-layoffs-supreme-court...

    The Supreme Court put a hold on the deal in August, after the Sackler family had agreed to pay around $6 billion to settle opioid-related claims, but only in return for a release from liability in ...

  7. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v...

    AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...

  8. Explainer-Will Twitter layoffs violate U.S. law?

    www.aol.com/news/explainer-twitter-layoffs...

    Twitter Inc has begun laying off employees under its new owner, Elon Musk. Twitter is already facing a proposed class action claiming the layoffs are imminent and will violate U.S. and California ...

  9. US asks court to reject TikTok's bid to stave off law that ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-asks-court-reject-delay...

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Justice Department late on Wednesday asked a U.S. appeals court to reject an emergency bid by TikTok to temporarily block a law that would require its Chinese parent ...