Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The first grand jury resulted in charges against Weisselberg, who subsequently provided testimony against the organization, which was in turn used to convict two subsidiary companies. [15] [16] [17] After the sentencing of the companies on January 13, 2023, Bragg stated that the broader investigation of the organization would continue. [18]
Two related investigations by New York State and City officials were opened by 2020 to determine whether the Trump Organization has committed financial fraud. One of these is a criminal case being conducted by the Manhattan district attorney (DA) and the other is a civil case being conducted by the New York State Attorney General (AG).
The Manhattan grand jury voted to indict Trump on March 30, 2023. [87] The indictment was filed with the New York Supreme Court (the ordinary trial court for felonies in the state of New York and not the final court of appeal for the state) the same day. [88] The charges were under seal until published when Trump was arraigned. [89] [90]
A jury convicted former President Donald Trump’s company on multiple tax fraud charges on Tuesday in a New York court. After deliberating for one day, the jury delivered a guilty verdict on all ...
“What’s important to understand with New York state as compared to federal jury selection…is that it’s attorney-led voir dire,” Phillip Hamilton, a criminal defense attorney in New York ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
New York v. Trump is a civil investigation and lawsuit by the office of the New York Attorney General (AG) alleging that individuals and business entities within the Trump Organization engaged in financial fraud by presenting vastly disparate property values to potential lenders and tax officials, in violation of New York Executive Law § 63(12).
In 1985, New York City brought a lawsuit against Trump for allegedly using tactics to force out tenants of 100 Central Park South, [37] which he intended to demolish together with the building next door. After ten years in court, the two sides negotiated a deal allowing the building to stand as condominiums.