enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Incorporation of the Bill of Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill...

    In United States constitutional law, incorporation is the doctrine by which portions of the Bill of Rights have been made applicable to the states.When the Bill of Rights was ratified, the courts held that its protections extended only to the actions of the federal government and that the Bill of Rights did not place limitations on the authority of the state and local governments.

  3. Palko v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palko_v._Connecticut

    Incorporation of the Bill of Rights was selective, not a general rule, and in this case the Court declined to incorporate the protection from double jeopardy against the states, even though the protection would most certainly have been upheld against the federal government.

  4. Cantwell v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantwell_v._Connecticut

    Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940), is a landmark court decision [1] [2] by the United States Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment's federal protection of religious free exercise incorporates via the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and so applies to state governments too.

  5. McDonald v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago

    McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), was a landmark [1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that found that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms", as protected under the Second Amendment, is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment and is thereby enforceable against the states.

  6. Eminent domain in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain_in_the...

    This was the beginning of what is now known as the "selective incorporation" doctrine. An expansive interpretation of eminent domain was reaffirmed in Berman v. Parker (1954), in which the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed an effort by the District of Columbia to take and raze blighted structures in order to eliminate slums in the Southwest ...

  7. Explainer-How Trump could bypass the Senate to install his ...

    www.aol.com/news/explainer-trump-could-bypass...

    This would erode the power of Congress and remove a significant check on his authority as president. According to the U.S. Constitution, the Senate and the president share the power of appointing ...

  8. Why Should You Stay Invested in Selective Insurance (SIGI) - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/why-stay-invested-selective...

    Solid renewal pricing, increase in exposure, higher income earned on fixed income securities and prudent capital deployment well poise Selective Insurance (SIGI) for growth.

  9. Barron v. Baltimore - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barron_v._Baltimore

    The city of Baltimore, Maryland initiated a public works project that involved the modification of several streams that emptied into Baltimore Harbor. City construction resulted in large amounts of sediment being deposited into the streams, which then emptied into the harbor near a profitable wharf owned and operated by John Barron.