Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Vinegar test is a cervical cancer testing method that uses acetic acid, a major component of vinegar. It has been found to be useful as an effective and inexpensive screening test. It has the potential, say researchers from the University of Zimbabwe and Johns Hopkins University, to improve the chances of preventing cancer in developing world. [1]
Kaitlyn Dever is returning to Netflix to star in a series based on a true story — well, kind of a true story. Dever (Unbelievable, Dopesick) plays infamous Australian wellness guru Belle Gibson ...
Hoxsey Therapy or Hoxsey Method is an alternative medical treatment promoted as a cure for cancer.The treatment consists of a caustic herbal paste for external cancers or a herbal mixture for "internal" cancers, combined with laxatives, douches, vitamin supplements, and dietary changes.
Wound healing. Research has found that oral supplementation of vitamin E (along with vitamin C and zinc) has a positive effect on reduced wound healing time. However, when it comes to topical ...
Miracle Mineral Supplement, often referred to as Miracle Mineral Solution, Master Mineral Solution, MMS or the CD protocol, [1] is a branded name for an aqueous solution of chlorine dioxide, an industrial bleaching agent, that has been falsely promoted as a cure for illnesses including HIV, cancer and the common cold.
Vitamin C may be even better for you than we thought. According to research, it may help stop cancer from spreading.. We're talking about the natural stuff, though. There are higher doses of ...
Acetic acid injection into a tumor has been used to treat cancer since the 1800s. [53] [54] Acetic acid is used as part of cervical cancer screening in many areas in the developing world. [55] The acid is applied to the cervix and if an area of white appears after about a minute the test is positive. [55]
Most alternative cancer treatments have not been tested in proper clinical trials. Among studies that have been published, the quality is often poor. A 2006 review of 196 clinical trials that studied unconventional cancer treatments found a lack of early-phase testing, little rationale for dosing regimens, and poor statistical analyses. [11]