enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Powers v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powers_v._Ohio

    Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case that re-examined the Batson Challenge. [1] Established by Batson v.Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), the Batson Challenge [2] prohibits jury selectors from using peremptory challenges on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, and sex.

  3. Beck v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beck_v._Ohio

    Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning evidence obtained as part of an unlawful arrest. Reversing the Ohio Supreme Court's decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Ohio police arrested defendant without probable cause, so the criminally-punishable evidence found on his person during an incidental search was inadmissible.

  4. Doyle v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doyle_v._Ohio

    Ohio, 426 U.S . 610 (1976), is a ... The Court ruled that the prosecution is permitted to exploit as inculpatory evidence a defendant's failure to disclose an ...

  5. Utility will pay $20 million to avoid prosecution in Ohio ...

    www.aol.com/news/utility-pay-20-million-avoid...

    The energy company at the center of a $60 million bribery scheme in Ohio will pay $20 million and avoid criminal charges as part of a deal with state prosecutors to resolve its role in the scandal.

  6. Jencks Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jencks_Act

    The Second Circuit has ruled that agent notes used to prepare a final report must also be preserved. [103] If the prosecution elects not to comply with the order to produce Jencks Material, the court shall strike the testimony of the witness and continue with the trial. If the interests of justice require such, the trial is properly called a ...

  7. I know it when I see it - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it

    Jacobellis v. Ohio [11] (1964) narrowed the scope of the Roth decision. Justice Potter Stewart, in his concurrence to the majority opinion, created the standard whereby all speech is protected except for "hard-core pornography". As for what, exactly, constitutes hard-core pornography, Stewart said "I shall not today attempt further to define ...

  8. Novak v. City of Parma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novak_v._City_of_Parma

    Novak v. City of Parma, No. 21-3290, is a 2022 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granting qualified immunity to the city of Parma, Ohio, and its officials for prosecuting Anthony Novak over a Facebook page that parodied the Parma Police Department's page.

  9. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.