Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Channel One News was a program designed for and broadcast to elementary, middle and high school students. It contained commercial advertising. Its advertising regulations changed over the years; they restricted advertisements related to food and beverages that were inconsistent with their healthy lifestyle initiatives, gambling, motion pictures above PG-13, politics, religion, and tobacco or ...
Helping Followers Distinguish Between Good and Bad Advice While Klontz says the advice he gives younger generations hasn't changed in 20 years, the challenges young people face have ...
] On prime-time television, the standard until 1982 was no more than 9.5 minutes of advertising per hour, but today it is between 14 and 17 minutes. With the introduction of the shorter 15-second-spot the total amount of ads increased even more. [citation needed] Ads are not only placed in breaks but also into sports telecasts during the game ...
Critics claimed that it was a problem in classrooms because it forced children to watch ads and wasted class time and tax dollars. [13] Supporters argued that the ads were necessary to help keep the program running and lease TVs, VCRs, and satellite dishes to schools, as well as commercial-free educational video through Channel One Connection.
Ads in The '80s. Ah, the '80s, a time some of us remember fondly or not at all. But if you remember anything beyond the brief, awful neon clothing trend, Izod shirts with designer jeans, and bad ...
The Education Department plans to use secret shoppers to determine if schools are engaging in practices that violate rules around federal student aid programs.
The effects of advertising on body image have been studied by researchers, ranging from psychologists to marketing professionals. [1] [2] [3] While many factors, such as "parenting, education, [and] intimate relationships" also affect body image, "the media and body image are closely related."
But by the early 1960s, schools weren’t receiving enough to feed all their students, and many pulled out of the program. As a result, middle-class students, whose parents could cover the difference between the government subsidy and the actual cost of a meal, ended up benefiting the most from school lunch, while the truly needy went hungry.