enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Literature review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literature_review

    Either way, a literature review provides the researcher/author and the audiences with general information of an existing knowledge of a particular topic. A good literature review has a proper research question, a proper theoretical framework, and/or a chosen research methodology. It serves to situate the current study within the body of the ...

  3. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    [129] [130] A Cochrane review found little empirical evidence that peer review ensures quality in biomedical research, [131] while a second systematic review and meta-analysis found a need for evidence-based peer review in biomedicine given the paucity of assessment of the interventions designed to improve the process.

  4. List of academic databases and search engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases...

    Readers' Guide to Periodical Literature: Literature: Reference guide to articles in >470 periodical magazines and journals, organized by article subject (1890 to present) Subscription H. W. Wilson Company: Rock's Backpages [66] Music: 40,000 Primary documents from the history of rock and roll.

  5. Systematic review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review

    A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

  6. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (medicine)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    In addition to experiments, primary sources normally contain introductory, background, or review sections that place their research in the context of previous work; these sections may be cited in Wikipedia with care: they are often incomplete [17] and typically less reliable than reviews or other sources, such as textbooks, which are intended ...

  7. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (science)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    A primary source, such as a report of a pivotal experiment cited as evidence for a hypothesis, may be a valuable component of an article. A good article may appropriately cite primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. Use of primary sources should always conform to the No original research policy.