Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Because ioctl is now supported on other devices than terminals, some systems display a different message such as "Inappropriate ioctl for device" instead. [ 6 ] [ 7 ] Occurrence
Sending a large request body to a server after a request has been rejected for inappropriate headers would be inefficient. To have a server check the request's headers, a client must send Expect: 100-continue as a header in its initial request and receive a 100 Continue status code in response before sending the body. If the client receives an ...
Invalid cross-device link ENODEV: 19: No such device ENOTDIR: 20: Not a directory EISDIR: 21: Is a directory EINVAL: 22: Invalid argument ENFILE: 23: Too many open files in system EMFILE: 24: Too many open files ENOTTY: 25: Inappropriate ioctl for device ETXTBSY: 26: Text file busy EFBIG: 27: File too large ENOSPC: 28: No space left on device ...
In computing, ioctl (an abbreviation of input/output control) is a system call for device-specific input/output operations and other operations which cannot be expressed by regular file semantics. It takes a parameter specifying a request code; the effect of a call depends completely on the request code. Request codes are often device-specific.
In February 1998, Linux 2.1.87 brought support for the /dev/ptmx multiplexing master device. [5] Opening this device provides access to an otherwise unused pseudo TTY master and allows the matching slave to be identified using an ioctl(). In April of that year, Linux 2.1.93 added a new virtual filesystem called devpts that is normally mounted ...
A low code-rate close to zero implies a strong code that uses many redundant bits to achieve a good performance, while a large code-rate close to 1 implies a weak code. The redundant bits that protect the information have to be transferred using the same communication resources that they are trying to protect.
The server has received a request that requires a negotiated security mechanism, and the response contains a list of suitable security mechanisms for the requester to choose between, [21]: §§2.3.1–2.3.2 or a digest authentication challenge. [21]: §2.4
501 5.5.2 Cannot Base64-decode Client responses [3] 501 5.7.0 Client initiated Authentication Exchange (only when the SASL mechanism specified that client does not begin the authentication exchange) [3] 502 Command not implemented 503 Bad sequence of commands 504 Command parameter is not implemented 504 5.5.4 Unrecognized authentication type [3]