Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The motivation for regulation of algorithms is the apprehension of losing control over the algorithms, whose impact on human life increases. Multiple countries have already introduced regulations in case of automated credit score calculation— right to explanation is mandatory for those algorithms.
Regulation of the issues of ethical and legal support for the development of AI is accelerating, and policy ensures state control of Chinese companies and over valuable data, including storage of data on Chinese users within the country and the mandatory use of People's Republic of China's national standards for AI, including over big data ...
Government by algorithm [1] (also known as algorithmic regulation, [2] regulation by algorithms, algorithmic governance, [3] [4] algocratic governance, algorithmic legal order or algocracy [5]) is an alternative form of government or social ordering where the usage of computer algorithms is applied to regulations, law enforcement, and generally any aspect of everyday life such as ...
It covers all types of AI across a broad range of sectors, with exceptions for AI systems used solely for military, national security, research and non-professional purposes. [5] As a piece of product regulation, it does not confer rights on individuals, but regulates the providers of AI systems and entities using AI in a professional context. [6]
Regarding the potential for smarter-than-human systems to be employed militarily, the Open Philanthropy Project writes that these scenarios "seem potentially as important as the risks related to loss of control", but research investigating AI's long-run social impact have spent relatively little time on this concern: "this class of scenarios ...
Algorithmic regulation may refer to: Government by algorithm, use of algorithms in government; Regulation of algorithms, rules and laws for algorithms
Rule-based machine learning approaches include learning classifier systems, [4] association rule learning, [5] artificial immune systems, [6] and any other method that relies on a set of rules, each covering contextual knowledge.
The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (enacted 2016, taking effect 2018) extends the automated decision-making rights in the 1995 Data Protection Directive to provide a legally disputed form of a right to an explanation, stated as such in Recital 71: "[the data subject should have] the right ... to obtain an explanation of the decision reached".