enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Furman v. Georgia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furman_v._Georgia

    Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), was a landmark criminal case in which the United States Supreme Court invalidated all then existing legal constructions for the death penalty in the United States. It was a 5–4 decision, with each member of the majority writing a separate opinion. [ 1]: 467–68 Following Furman, in order to reinstate ...

  3. Gregg v. Georgia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregg_v._Georgia

    Gregg v. Georgia, Proffitt v. Florida, Jurek v. Texas, Woodson v. North Carolina, and Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 153 (1976), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. It reaffirmed the Court's acceptance of the use of the death penalty in the United States, upholding, in particular, the death sentence imposed on Troy Leon Gregg. The ...

  4. Wrongful execution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrongful_execution

    Wrongful execution is a miscarriage of justice occurring when an innocent person is put to death by capital punishment.Cases of wrongful execution are cited as an argument by opponents of capital punishment, while proponents say that the argument of innocence concerns the credibility of the justice system as a whole and does not solely undermine the use of the death penalty.

  5. List of wrongful convictions in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrongful...

    In October 1984, both McCollum and Brown were sentenced to death, with Brown becoming the youngest person on North Carolina's death row. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia used McCollum's case to justify the existence of the death penalty. [151] After appealing, both death sentences were overturned in 1988, and the two had retrials in 1991.

  6. Herrera v. Collins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herrera_v._Collins

    Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled by 6 votes to 3 that a claim of actual innocence does not entitle a petitioner to federal habeas corpus relief by way of the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

  7. Atkins v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atkins_v._Virginia

    Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6–3 that executing people with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment 's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, but that states can define who has an intellectual disability. [ 1]

  8. Roper v. Simmons - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roper_v._Simmons

    Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that it is unconstitutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed while under the age of 18. [ 1] The 5–4 decision overruled Stanford v. Kentucky, in which the court had upheld execution of offenders at ...

  9. S v Makwanyane - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S_v_Makwanyane

    The Court held that, in practice, there was an element of chance at every stage of the process of implementing the death penalty: The outcome may be dependent upon factors such as the way the case is investigated by the police, the way the case is presented by the prosecutor, how effectively the accused is defended, the personality and particular attitude to capital punishment of the trial ...