enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 1996 California Proposition 218 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_California...

    General enhancement of property value does not constitute 'special benefit.'" [135] The California Supreme Court unanimously confirmed and upheld the tighter "special benefit" definition in interpreting the term to mean that a special benefit must affect an assessed parcel in a way that is particular and distinct from its effect on other ...

  3. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nollan_v._California...

    Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled a California Coastal Commission regulation which required private homeowners to dedicate a public easement along valuable beachfront property as a condition of approval for a construction permit to renovate their beach bungalow unconstitutional.

  4. Disparagement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparagement

    Disparagement, in United States trademark law, was a statutory cause of action which permitted a party to petition the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to cancel a trademark registration that "may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt or ...

  5. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruneyard_Shopping_Center...

    Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 9, 1980 which affirmed the decision of the California Supreme Court in a case that arose out of a free speech dispute between the Pruneyard Shopping Center in Campbell, California, and several local high school students (who wished to canvass signatures for a petition against United ...

  6. Peruta v. San Diego County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peruta_v._San_Diego_County

    Peruta v. San Diego, 824 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2016), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy regarding requiring documentation of "good cause" that "distinguish[es] the applicant from the mainstream and places the applicant in harm's way" (Cal. Pen. Code §§ 26150, 26155) before issuing a ...

  7. What can protesters legally do on California campuses? Is ...

    www.aol.com/protest-protected-university-grounds...

    California’s universities are typically viewed as public or limited public forums where the public can be invited.” Across California, students at an estimated 27 colleges — both public ...

  8. Special motion to strike - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_motion_to_strike

    The motion may not be used in any action brought 'solely in the public interest or on behalf of the general public', so long as the plaintiff does not seek any relief for themself greater than the relief they seek for others and can establish all of the following: the action is intended to enforce an important right affecting the public interest;

  9. Law of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_California

    Bernard Witkin's Summary of California Law, a legal treatise popular with California judges and lawyers. The Constitution of California is the foremost source of state law. . Legislation is enacted within the California Statutes, which in turn have been codified into the 29 California Co