Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
"Prior acts" (or "nose") coverage transfers the retro-active date for an old policy to a new insurance carrier—eliminating the need to purchase tail coverage from the last carrier. Nose coverage is usually less expensive than purchasing tail coverage from the old carrier. Tail coverage costs 2–3 times the expiring premium.
The attitudinal underinsurance definition is recognized when; (1) at least one health benefit that the individual would prefer to receive is not covered by insurance, (2) when there is at least one symptom that the person believed required treatment for which insurance coverage treatment was not provided, or (3) when a person is dissatisfied ...
Pre-existing condition exclusions were prohibited for HIPAA-eligible individuals (those with 18 months continuous coverage unbroken for no more than 63 days and coming from a group health insurance plan). Individual (non-group) health insurance plans could exclude maternity coverage for a pre-existing condition of pregnancy. [2]
The “Charmed” and “Beverly Hills, 90210” star said in a lawsuit that a lapse in health insurance delayed doctors diagnosing her with breast cancer. Annual screening mammograms are ...
The immediate result of a policy lapse is a loss in coverage, which can quickly snowball into other issues. Below are some of the consequences homeowners may anticipate when a policy lapses. You ...
Lapse in auto insurance coverage or driving without insurance. Medical complications such as ... you will likely still need to maintain insurance on your vehicle to avoid a lapse in coverage.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996; Other short titles: Kassebaum–Kennedy Act, Kennedy–Kassebaum Act: Long title: An Act To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to improve portability and continuity of health insurance coverage in the group and individual markets, to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in health insurance and health care delivery, to promote the use ...
The Medicare Part D coverage gap (informally known as the Medicare donut hole) was a period of consumer payments for prescription medication costs that lay between the initial coverage limit and the catastrophic coverage threshold when the consumer was a member of a Medicare Part D prescription-drug program administered by the United States federal government.