Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009), is a United States labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on unlawful discrimination through disparate impact under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
[a] Its analysis of employment discrimination cases in federal courts between 1990 and 1994 concluded that between 1 and 3 percent involved claims of reverse discrimination; and that a "high proportion" of the claims were found to be without merit.
Reverse racism, sometimes referred to as reverse discrimination, [1] is the concept that affirmative action and similar color-conscious programs for redressing racial inequality are forms of anti-white racism. [2]
Louisiana State University employment law professor William Corbett said that if Ames wins, "I think those who believe that reverse discrimination is a prevalent problem will see it as a victory ...
Judy Conti, government affairs director at the National Employment Law Project, a worker advocacy group, said Trump had stripped away a “key tool” in combating discrimination.
The investigation, she wrote, would determine if the fire department engaged in “a pattern or practice” of discrimination against Black people in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services is a pending United States Supreme Court case about whether a claim of reverse discrimination requires a showing of additional "background circumstances" supporting a suspicion that the employer discriminates against the majority group.
The lawsuit also alleged he was the victim of racism and multiple instances of retaliation at the small community services district.