Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor in Fort Worth, Texas, whose 2018 ruling declaring all of Obamacare unconstitutional was the subject of the 2021 Supreme Court case.
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), is a landmark [2] [3] [4] United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court upheld Congress's power to enact most provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly called Obamacare, [5] [6] and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA), including a requirement for most ...
Since the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), there have been numerous actions in federal courts to challenge the constitutionality of the legislation. [1] [2] They include challenges by states against the ACA, reactions from legal experts with respect to its constitutionality, several federal court rulings on the ACA's constitutionality, the final ruling on the constitutionality of the ...
January 27, 2025 (April 29, 2025) McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corp: 23-1226: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. October 4, 2024: January 21, 2025 Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn: 23-365
The lower-court ruling chipped away at the program sometimes referred to as Obamacare. The Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider reinstating certain coverage requirements under the Affordable ...
The Supreme Court will hear a case determining the fate of free preventive services under the Affordable Care Act. In a brief order issued Friday, the justices said they will consider whether ...
The federal government appealed to the high court after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with employers who argued they can't be forced to provide full insurance coverage for things like medication to prevent HIV and some cancer screenings. The lower-court ruling chipped away at the program sometimes referred to as Obamacare.
The Supreme Court reversed this ruling in the consolidated case, Maine Community Health Options v. United States , reaffirming as with Judge Wheeler that the government had a responsibility to pay those funds under the ACA and the use of riders to de-obligate its from those payments was illegal.