Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The set of the equivalence classes is sometimes called the quotient set or the quotient space of by , and is denoted by /. When the set S {\displaystyle S} has some structure (such as a group operation or a topology ) and the equivalence relation ∼ {\displaystyle \,\sim \,} is compatible with this structure, the quotient set often inherits a ...
For example, the natural numbers 2 and 6 have a common factor greater than 1, and 6 and 3 have a common factor greater than 1, but 2 and 3 do not have a common factor greater than 1. The empty relation R (defined so that aRb is never true) on a set X is vacuously symmetric and transitive; however, it is not reflexive (unless X itself is empty).
In some other systems of axiomatic set theory, for example in Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory and Morse–Kelley set theory, relations are extended to classes. A set A is said to have cardinality smaller than or equal to the cardinality of a set B, if there exists a one-to-one function (an injection) from A into B.
In constructive mathematics, "not empty" and "inhabited" are not equivalent: every inhabited set is not empty but the converse is not always guaranteed; that is, in constructive mathematics, a set that is not empty (where by definition, "is empty" means that the statement () is true) might not have an inhabitant (which is an such that ).
The picture shows an example f and the corresponding T; red: n∈f(n)\T, blue:n∈T\f(n). While the cardinality of a finite set is simply comparable to its number of elements, extending the notion to infinite sets usually starts with defining the notion of comparison of arbitrary sets (some of which are possibly infinite).
Forming a partial setoid from a type and a PER is analogous to forming subsets and quotients in classical set-theoretic mathematics. The algebraic notion of congruence can also be generalized to partial equivalences, yielding the notion of subcongruence , i.e. a homomorphic relation that is symmetric and transitive, but not necessarily reflexive.
The categories and are equivalent; we can (for example) have map to and map both objects of to and all morphisms to . By contrast, the category C {\displaystyle C} with a single object and a single morphism is not equivalent to the category E {\displaystyle E} with two objects and only two identity morphisms.
When is empty, the condition given above is an example of a vacuous truth. So the intersection of the empty family should be the universal set (the identity element for the operation of intersection), [4] but in standard set theory, the universal set does not exist.