enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavey_&_Matthews_Pty_Ltd_v...

    Pavey & Mathews would have received less restitution only if Mrs Paul had withdrawn her promise before the work had begun, but the builders had gone ahead anyway. Also, the quantum meruit (the amount rewarded) could be no higher than the objective market rate for the work, even if Mrs Paul’s promise was for a higher price.

  3. Manrique v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manrique_v._United_States

    Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. United States , 581 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a defendant wishing to appeal an order imposing restitution in a deferred restitution case must file a notice of appeal from that order.

  4. Restitution and unjust enrichment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restitution_and_unjust...

    The law responds to each of them by imposing an obligation to pay compensatory damages. Restitution for wrongs is the subject which deals with the issue of when exactly the law also responds by imposing an obligation to make restitution. Example. In Attorney General v Blake, [25] an English court found itself faced with the following claim. The ...

  5. Paroline v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paroline_v._United_States

    Paroline v. United States, 572 U.S. 434 (2014), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that to recover restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 2259, the government or the victim must establish a causal relationship between the defendant's conduct and the victim's harm or damages.

  6. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritor_Savings_Bank_v._Vinson

    Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), is a US labor law case, where the United States Supreme Court, in a 9–0 decision, recognized sexual harassment as a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case was the first of its kind to reach the Supreme Court and would redefine sexual harassment in the workplace. [1] [2]

  7. Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landmark_Cases_in_the_Law...

    Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (2006) is a book edited by Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell, which outlines the key cases in English unjust enrichment law and restitution. Content [ edit ]

  8. Restitution in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restitution_in_English_law

    The English law of Restitution is the law of gain-based recovery. [1] Its precise scope and underlying principles remain a matter of significant academic and judicial controversy. [ 2 ] Broadly speaking, the law of restitution concerns actions in which one person claims an entitlement in respect of a gain acquired by another, rather than ...

  9. Attorney General v Blake - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney_General_v_Blake

    The reason of the rule applying to fiduciaries applies to him. Secondly, I bear in mind that the enduring strength of the common law is that it has been developed on a case-by-case basis by judges for whom the attainment of practical justice was a major objective of their work. It is still one of the major moulding forces of judicial decision ...

  1. Related searches examples of restitution cases in the workplace policy making framework sample

    what is a restitutionunjust enrichment restitution