enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Asbestos and the law (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asbestos_and_the_law...

    Asbestos litigation is the longest, most expensive mass tort in U.S. history, involving more than 8,000 defendants and 700,000 claimants. [1] By the early 1990s, "more than half of the 25 largest asbestos manufacturers in the US, including Amatex, Carey-Canada, Celotex, Eagle-Picher, Forty-Eight Insulations, Manville Corporation, National Gypsum, Standard Insulation, Unarco, and UNR Industries ...

  3. Asbestos and the law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asbestos_and_the_law

    However, there is no enforcement of the rules at ground level, hence asbestos usage is prevalent without following even the simplest basic safety rules. The Centre for Pollution Control Board struggles to enforce their own guidelines for asbestos as hazardous waste and relies on industries and companies to volunteer themselves to follow Safety ...

  4. Breach of contract - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_contract

    Any breach of contract (warranty, condition or innominate term) gives rise to a right in the hands of the innocent party to recover their damage suffered which caused by the breach of contract by the defaulting party. Damages in the UK are the only [4] remedy available for breach of a warranty.

  5. Anticipatory repudiation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticipatory_repudiation

    Anticipatory repudiation or anticipatory breach is a concept in the law of contracts which describes words or conduct by a contracting party that evinces an intention not to perform or not to be bound by provisions of the agreement that require performance in the future.

  6. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_&_Youngs,_Inc._v._Kent

    Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. Kent, 230 N.Y. 239 (1921) is an American contract law case of the New York Court of Appeals with a majority opinion by Judge Benjamin N. Cardozo.The case addresses several contract principles including applying the doctrine of substantial performance in preventing forfeiture and determining the appropriate remedy following a partial or defective performance.

  7. Tortious interference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference

    Inducing a breach of contract was a tort of accessory liability, and an intention to cause a breach of contract was a necessary and sufficient requirement for liability; a person had to know that he was inducing a breach of contract and to intend to do so; that a conscious decision not to inquire into the existence of a fact could be treated as ...

  8. California Codes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Codes

    In 1868, the California Legislature authorized the first of many ad hoc Code Commissions to begin the process of codifying California law. Each Code Commission was a one- or two-year temporary agency which either closed at the end of the authorized period or was reauthorized and rolled over into the next period; thus, in some years there was no ...

  9. Summers v. Tice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summers_v._Tice

    Decided November 17, 1948; Full case name: Charles A. Summers v. Howard W. Tice, et al. Citation(s) 33 Cal.2d 80 199 P.2d 1: Holding; When a plaintiff suffers a single indivisible injury, for which the negligence of each of several potential tortfeasors could have been a but-for cause, but only one of which could have actually been the cause, all the potential tortfeasors are jointly and ...