Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Accountability, in terms of ethics and governance, is equated with answerability, culpability, liability, and the expectation of account-giving. [1]As in an aspect of governance, it has been central to discussions related to problems in the public sector, nonprofit, private (), and individual contexts.
The Oz Principle defines accountability as “a personal choice to rise above one’s circumstances and demonstrate the ownership necessary for achieving desired results to See It, Own It, Solve It, and Do It.” [4] [5] The book is organized around the Steps To Accountability model, which shows how to create both individual and organization ...
The diffusion of responsibility is present in almost all groups, but to varying degrees, and can be mitigated by reducing group size, defining clear expectations, and increasing accountability. [ 3 ] Assumption of responsibility tends to decrease when the potential helping group is larger, resulting in little aiding behavior demonstrated by the ...
The argument from luck is a criticism against the libertarian conception of moral responsibility. It suggests that any given action, and even a person's character, is the result of various forces outside a person's control.
Accountability for reasonableness is an ethical framework that describes the conditions of a fair decision-making process. It focuses on how decisions should be made and why these decisions are ethical.
Responsibility may refer to: . Collective responsibility – Responsibility of organizations, groups and societies; Corporate social responsibility – Form of corporate self-regulation aimed at contributing to social or charitable goals
Some troops leave the battlefield injured. Others return from war with mental wounds. Yet many of the 2 million Iraq and Afghanistan veterans suffer from a condition the Defense Department refuses to acknowledge: Moral injury.
The changes brought from these revolutions significantly increased the personal autonomy of individuals due to the lack of structural restraints giving them added freedom of choice. This concept is known as "new voluntarism" [ 34 ] where individuals have free choice on how to be religious and the free choice whether to be religious or not.