enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pumping lemma for regular languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumping_lemma_for_regular...

    The pumping lemma is often used to prove that a particular language is non-regular: a proof by contradiction may consist of exhibiting a string (of the required length) in the language that lacks the property outlined in the pumping lemma. Example: The language = {:} over the alphabet = {,} can be shown to be non-regular as follows:

  3. Pumping lemma for context-free languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumping_lemma_for_context...

    The pumping lemma for context-free languages (called just "the pumping lemma" for the rest of this article) describes a property that all context-free languages are guaranteed to have. The property is a property of all strings in the language that are of length at least p {\displaystyle p} , where p {\displaystyle p} is a constant—called the ...

  4. Induction of regular languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_of_regular_languages

    In computational learning theory, induction of regular languages refers to the task of learning a formal description (e.g. grammar) of a regular language from a given set of example strings. Although E. Mark Gold has shown that not every regular language can be learned this way (see language identification in the limit ), approaches have been ...

  5. Lemma (morphology) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemma_(morphology)

    In morphology and lexicography, a lemma (pl.: lemmas or lemmata) is the canonical form, [1] dictionary form, or citation form of a set of word forms. [2] In English, for example, break , breaks , broke , broken and breaking are forms of the same lexeme , with break as the lemma by which they are indexed.

  6. Chomsky normal form - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_normal_form

    To convert a grammar to Chomsky normal form, a sequence of simple transformations is applied in a certain order; this is described in most textbooks on automata theory. [4]: 87–94 [5] [6] [7] The presentation here follows Hopcroft, Ullman (1979), but is adapted to use the transformation names from Lange, Leiß (2009).

  7. Chomsky hierarchy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chomsky_hierarchy

    Note that the set of grammars corresponding to recursive languages is not a member of this hierarchy; these would be properly between Type-0 and Type-1. Every regular language is context-free, every context-free language is context-sensitive, every context-sensitive language is recursive and every recursive language is recursively enumerable.

  8. Ogden's lemma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogden's_lemma

    Ogden's lemma is often stated in the following form, which can be obtained by "forgetting about" the grammar, and concentrating on the language itself: If a language L is context-free, then there exists some number (where p may or may not be a pumping length) such that for any string s of length at least p in L and every way of "marking" p or more of the positions in s, s can be written as

  9. File:Pumping-Lemma xyz.pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pumping-Lemma_xyz.pdf

    Illustration of the pumping lemma for regular languages, using xyz decomposition. Date: 29 November 2014: Source: Own work, inspired by File:Pumping-Lemma.png: Author: Jochen Burghardt: Other versions: File:Pumping-Lemma xyz.pdf * File:Pumping-Lemma xyz svg.svg