Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a North Carolina statute that prohibited registered sex offenders from using social media websites was unconstitutional because it violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects freedom of speech.
Place Level Court Live broadcast Recording Country Subdivision Name Abbrev. Video Audio Live captions Video Audio Transcript — International
Boyd, Georgia Court of Appeals 2010 (304 Ga. App. 563) In this case involving a permanent protective order prohibiting Jonathan Huggins from stalking Karen Boyd, Huggins appealed the trial court's denial of his motion to set aside the order, arguing that the trial court had no personal jurisdiction over him. Because it was undisputed that ...
The Hutelmyer case. In 1997, a jury in Alamance County awarded $1 million to Dorothy Hutelmyer, who argued in court that a secretary in her husband’s insurance office had intentionally wooed him ...
What’s the state’s top court has actually denied is the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct. And, for good measure, it also ignored the 14th Amendment’s requirement that legal matters be ...
The second case takes aim at the state’s restrictions on medication abortions, and was filed in January 2023, after the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional ...
Text of Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio) State v. Klopfer 145 S.E.2d 909 (1966)-North Carolina Supreme Court opinion (South Eastern Reporter, second series) 266 N.C. 349-North Carolina Supreme Court court opinion (North Carolina Reporter)
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us