Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
p. -value. In null-hypothesis significance testing, the -value[note 1] is the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the result actually observed, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is correct. [2][3] A very small p -value means that such an extreme observed outcome would be very unlikely under the null hypothesis.
The test statistic is approximately F-distributed with and degrees of freedom, and hence is the significance of the outcome of tested against (;,) where is a quantile of the F-distribution, with and degrees of freedom, and is the chosen level of significance (usually 0.05 or 0.01).
These values can be calculated evaluating the quantile function (also known as "inverse CDF" or "ICDF") of the chi-squared distribution; [21] e. g., the χ 2 ICDF for p = 0.05 and df = 7 yields 2.1673 ≈ 2.17 as in the table above, noticing that 1 – p is the p-value from the table.
Statistical significance. In statistical hypothesis testing, [1][2] a result has statistical significance when a result at least as "extreme" would be very infrequent if the null hypothesis were true. [3] More precisely, a study's defined significance level, denoted by , is the probability of the study rejecting the null hypothesis, given that ...
The partition coefficient, abbreviated P, is defined as a particular ratio of the concentrations of a solute between the two solvents (a biphase of liquid phases), specifically for un- ionized solutes, and the logarithm of the ratio is thus log P. [10]: 275ff When one of the solvents is water and the other is a non-polar solvent, then the log P ...
Direct interpretation of the harmonic mean p-value. The weighted harmonic mean of p -values is defined as where are weights that must sum to one, i.e. . Equal weights may be chosen, in which case . In general, interpreting the HMP directly as a p -value is anti-conservative, meaning that the false positive rate is higher than expected.
The conditional probability P ( Y ≤ 0.75 | X = 0.5 ) cannot be interpreted as P ( Y ≤ 0.75, X = 0.5 ) / P ( X = 0.5 ), since the latter gives 0/0. Accordingly, P ( Y ≤ 0.75 | X = 0.5 ) cannot be interpreted via empirical frequencies, since the exact value X = 0.5 has no chance to appear at random, not even once during an infinite sequence ...
Note that a p-value of 0.01 suggests that 1% of the time a result at least that extreme would be obtained by chance; if hundreds or thousands of hypotheses (with mutually relatively uncorrelated independent variables) are tested, then one is likely to obtain a p-value less than 0.01 for many null hypotheses.