Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Download as PDF; Printable version; From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. ... 2017 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States#Kisela v. Hughes;
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018. [1] ...
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 584 of the United States Reports: . Note: As of August 2024, final bound volumes for the U.S. Supreme Court's United States Reports have been published through volume 579.
Octane Fitness, arguing that their elliptical products did not infringe ICON's patent, won on summary judgment and later moved for reimbursement for their attorney's fees. The district court denied the motion for attorney's fees, stating that even though Octane Fitness eventually prevailed, ICON's claims were not objectively baseless, [ 1 ] : 5 ...
A crisis pregnancy center (CPC) is a type of nonprofit organization established to counsel pregnant women against having an abortion. [3] [4] [5] CPCs provide peer counseling related to abortion, pregnancy, and childbirth, and they may offer non-medical services such as financial assistance, child-rearing resources, and adoption referrals. [6]
Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597 is an English contract law case. In it, Justice Blackburn set out his classic statement of the objective interpretation of people's conduct (acceptance by conduct) when entering into a contract.
Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that U.S. Attorney General John D. Ashcroft could not be personally sued for his involvement in the detention of a U.S. citizen in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States.
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the inter partes review process granted by Congress to the United States Patent and Trademark Office for challenging the validity of patents, rather than a jury trial, is constitutional and did not violate either Article III of the Constitution ...