enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: publishers who accept unsolicited material items are considered valuable

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Predatory publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_publishing

    Predatory publishing, also write-only publishing [1] [2] or deceptive publishing, [3] is an exploitative academic publishing business model, where the journal or publisher prioritizes self-interest at the expense of scholarship. It is characterized by misleading information, deviates from the standard peer-review process, is highly non ...

  3. Slush pile - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slush_pile

    In publishing, a slush pile is a set of unsolicited query letters or manuscripts that have either been directly sent to a publisher by an author, or which have been delivered via a literary agent representing the author who may or may not be familiar to the publisher. [1]

  4. Academic publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_publishing

    Academic publishing is the subfield of publishing which distributes academic research and scholarship. Most academic work is published in academic journal articles, books or theses . The part of academic written output that is not formally published but merely printed up or posted on the Internet is often called " grey literature ".

  5. Vanity press - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanity_press

    Hybrid publishing is the source of debate in the publishing industry, with some viewing hybrid publishers as vanity presses in disguise. [7] [dead link ‍] However, a true hybrid publisher is selective in what they publish and will share the costs (and therefore the risks) with the author, whereas with a vanity press, the author pays the full cost of production and therefore carries all the risk.

  6. Wikipedia : Identifying and using self-published works

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    Neither the subject material, nor the size of the entity, nor whether the source is printed on paper or available electronically, nor whether the author is a famous expert, makes any difference (though the last point may affect whether you can cite the self-published source in a Wikipedia article). Be careful in identifying the publishers of books.

  7. 17 of the most valuable items on the black market - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2017-06-08-17-of-the-most...

    Drugs, weapons and human trafficking. That's probably what comes to mind when thinking about the black market -- but the illegal trade is more varied than you may think, and it also encompasses ...

  8. Collectibles You Probably Tossed That Are Now Worth a Fortune

    www.aol.com/22-collectibles-probably-tossed-now...

    Though View-Masters today are mainly considered children's toys, when they were first produced in the 1930s, they were marketed to adults as a more modern (and fairly upscale) version of the ...

  9. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    The publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press) Any of the three can affect reliability. Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process, authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both. These qualifications should be demonstrable to other people.

  1. Ads

    related to: publishers who accept unsolicited material items are considered valuable