Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Most recently, telecoms giant AT&T dropped its employee assistance program (EAP), a type of benefits offering that typically covers an allotted number of mental health treatment sessions, and ...
United States v. AT&T may refer to several court cases: United States v. AT&T, a lawsuit enforcing the divestiture of the Bell System; United States v. AT&T, a lawsuit attempting to block a merger with Time Warner
Semtek v. Lockheed Martin, 531 U.S. 497 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the claim preclusive effect of a federal judgment on a claim over which subject matter jurisdiction is based solely on diversity is determined by the common law of the state in which the federal district court rendering the decision is located.
AT&T was founded as Bell Telephone Company by Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Watson and Gardiner Greene Hubbard after Bell's patenting of the telephone in 1875. [21] By 1881, Bell Telephone Company had become the American Bell Telephone Company. [22]
Learn about all the AOL plans designed to keep you and your data protected. We offer mobile and data security, premium technical support, and protection from identity theft, viruses, malware and other online threats.
AT&T Corporation v. Hulteen , 556 U.S. 701 (2009), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court , holding that maternity leave taken before the passage of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act needed not to be considered in calculating employee pension benefits.
The decree replaced the entirety of the previous final judgment of January 24, 1956 in the case United States v. Western Electric Inc. , [ 2 ] [ 3 ] which had been transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and is referred to in the MFJ as the Western Electric case, [ 4 ] : 143 (also footnote 4) and ...
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...