Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A transcendental equation need not be an equation between elementary functions, although most published examples are. In some cases, a transcendental equation can be solved by transforming it into an equivalent algebraic equation. Some such transformations are sketched below; computer algebra systems may provide more elaborated transformations. [a]
Painlevé (1900, 1902) found that forty-four of the fifty equations are reducible in the sense that they can be solved in terms of previously known functions, leaving just six equations requiring the introduction of new special functions to solve them. There were some computational errors, and as a result he missed three of the equations ...
Hilbert's tenth problem does not ask whether there exists an algorithm for deciding the solvability of Diophantine equations, but rather asks for the construction of such an algorithm: "to devise a process according to which it can be determined in a finite number of operations whether the equation is solvable in rational integers". That this ...
One may also use Newton's method to solve systems of k equations, which amounts to finding the (simultaneous) zeroes of k continuously differentiable functions :. This is equivalent to finding the zeroes of a single vector-valued function F : R k → R k . {\displaystyle F:\mathbb {R} ^{k}\to \mathbb {R} ^{k}.}
The Kansa method is a computer method used to solve partial differential equations. Its main advantage is it is very easy to understand and program on a computer. It is much less complicated than the finite element method. Another advantage is it works well on multi variable problems.
Solving for is more or less equivalent to solving for the true anomaly, or the difference between the true anomaly and the mean anomaly, which is called the "Equation of the center". One can write an infinite series expression for the solution to Kepler's equation using Lagrange inversion , but the series does not converge for all combinations ...
In an isosceles triangle, if the ratio of the base angle to the angle at the vertex is algebraic but not rational, is then the ratio between base and side always transcendental? Is a b {\displaystyle a^{b}} always transcendental , for algebraic a ∉ { 0 , 1 } {\displaystyle a\not \in \{0,1\}} and irrational algebraic b {\displaystyle b} ?
Many mathematical problems have been stated but not yet solved. These problems come from many areas of mathematics, such as theoretical physics, computer science, algebra, analysis, combinatorics, algebraic, differential, discrete and Euclidean geometries, graph theory, group theory, model theory, number theory, set theory, Ramsey theory, dynamical systems, and partial differential equations.