enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: patent claim systems reviews youtube channel lineup

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of patent claim types - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_patent_claim_types

    This is a list of special types of claims that may be found in a patent or patent application.For explanations about independent and dependent claims and about the different categories of claims, i.e. product or apparatus claims (claims referring to a physical entity), and process, method or use claims (claims referring to an activity), see Claim (patent), section "Basic types and categories".

  3. Patent claim - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_claim

    Claims were recommended in published patents in the Third Patent Act (1836) and finally became mandatory in the Fourth Patent Act (1870). [7] However, even among patent legal systems in which the claims are used as the reference to decide the scope of protection conferred by a patent, the way the claims are used may vary substantially.

  4. YouTube copyright issues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_copyright_issues

    [31] [32] This prompted YouTube's CEO Susan Wojcicki to respond three months later with "Thank you @YouTube community for all the feedback. We're listening" in February 2016. [33] Videos continued to be removed and flagged on the site when copyright claims were made against uploaders for using the alleged use of protected material.

  5. Doctrine of equivalents - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_equivalents

    Ireland appears to subscribe to a doctrine of equivalents. In Farbwerke Hoechst v Intercontinental Pharmaceuticals (Eire) Ltd (1968), a case involving a patent of a chemical process, the High Court found that the defendant had infringed the plaintiff's patent despite the fact that the defendant had substituted the starting material specified in the patent claim for another material.

  6. Inter partes review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter_partes_review

    An inter partes review is used to challenge the patentability of one or more claims in a U.S. patent only on a ground that could be raised under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 or 103 (non-obviousness), and only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed publications. [3]

  7. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Claim interpretation in patent, standard of review by the Federal Circuit. Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC - Supreme Court, 2015. Patent misuse is governed by patent law policy, and need not comport with antitrust policy if the two differ.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_LLC_v._Oracle...

    The patent phase began on May 7, 2012, with the same jury. [29] By the time of trial, Oracle's patent case comprised claims from two patents, 6,061,520 (Method and system for performing static initialization), [30] (the '520 patent) and RE38104 (Method and apparatus for resolving data references in generated code). [31] (the '104 patent ...

  1. Ad

    related to: patent claim systems reviews youtube channel lineup