Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
LoopNet acquired BizBuySell (2004), [6] CityFeet (2007), [7] REApps (2008), [8] Land & Farm/Lands of America (2008) and Bizquest (2010). [9] In April 2012, CoStar Group acquired LoopNet for approximately $860 million in cash and stock. [10] In 2014, the company settled a trademark infringement lawsuit that it brought against Dotloop. [11]
Smith v Croft (No 2) [1988] Ch 114 is a UK company law case concerning derivative claims. Its principle that in allowing a derivative claim to continue the court will have regard to the majority of the minority's views has been codified in Companies Act 2006 , section 263(4).
Smith v Smith [1] is an important case in South African law, in particular in the area of civil procedure. It was heard and decided in the Witwatersrand Local Division by Millin J on 22 January 1947. An action for judgment on motion under Rule of Court 42, the case concerned the service of summons at the defendant's place of business, and ...
Smith v. Summit Entertainment LLC, No. 3:11-cv-00348 (N.D. Ohio June 6, 2011), [1] was a case heard by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, in which professional singer Matthew Smith, known as Matt Heart, sued Summit Entertainment.
Smith v. United States; Smith v. United States; Smith v. United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977), a case about federal obscenity prosecutions; Smith v. United States, 508 U.S. 223 (1993), a case about exchanging guns for drugs; Smith v. United States, 568 U.S. 106 (2013), a case about members leaving a drug conspiracy group; Smith v.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit, 547 U.S. 71 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the extent to which state law securities fraud class action claims were preempted by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA).
Smith v. Bolles, 132 U.S. 125 (1889), was an action to recover out-of-pocket damages for alleged fraudulent representations in the sale of shares of mining stock. The plaintiff was denied benefit of the bargain damages. The case is important in contract law, specifically legal remedies and compensating expectancies.
Smith v. Van Gorkom 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985) [1] is a United States corporate law case of the Delaware Supreme Court, discussing a director's duty of care.