Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that an objective reasonableness standard should apply to a civilian's claim that law enforcement officials used excessive force in the course of making an arrest, investigatory stop, or other "seizure" of his or her person.
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 490 of ... United States v. Sokolow: 490 U.S. 1: 1989: Dallas v. ... Graham v. Connor: 490 U.S ...
The United States Supreme Court, in the case of Graham v. Connor, (1989) ruled that excessive use of force claims must be evaluated under the "objectively reasonable" standard of the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, the "reasonableness" factor of a use of force incident must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, and ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Kingsley v. Hendrickson , 576 U.S. 389 (2015), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held in a 5–4 decision that a pretrial detainee must prove only that force used by police is excessive according to an objective standard, not that a police officer was subjectively aware that the force used was unreasonable.
In a 1986 pre-Feist case, West's citation copyright claim was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in a preliminary injunction case brought by West against Mead Data, owner of Lexis (West v. Mead), [5] but in a case commenced in 1994 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the U.S. Court of ...
By September 2020, several hundred legal cases relating to the election had been filed. [219] About 250 of these had to do with the mechanics of voting in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic. [219] The Supreme Court ruled on a number of these cases, [220] primarily issuing emergency stays instead of going through the normal process due to the ...
The following year, 1987, the Supreme Court had first dealt with the Fourth Amendment rights of government employees under administrative investigation in O'Connor v. Ortega, a case arising from the search of a supervising physician's office and records at a California public hospital. By a 5-4 margin the court had ruled that while public ...