Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U.S. 47 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the federal government, under the Solomon Amendment, could constitutionally withhold funding from universities if they refuse to give military recruiters access to school resources.
Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights
Case name Citation Date decided Texaco Inc. v. Dagher: 547 U.S. 1: 2006: Scheidler v. National Organization for Women: 547 U.S. 9: 2006: Ill. Tool Works Inc. v ...
images.huffingtonpost.com
Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal: 546 U.S. 418 (2006) Religious Freedom Restoration Act • statutory interpretation: Unanimous: Roberts' opinion, which was unanimous as to the eight justices participating, ruled that a church was properly granted an injunction under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act against criminal prosecution for its sacramental use of a ...
The Supreme Court, in Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc. (2006), unanimously held that the federal government could constitutionally withhold funding from universities, no matter what their nondiscrimination policies might be, for refusing to give military recruiters access to school resources. An association of law ...
united states district court for the district of columbia _____ public employees for environmental ) responsibility, et al., )
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights - Amicus curiae for Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights; MGM v. Grokster - Amicus curiae in support of Grokster; 2006 Qassim v. Bush - Amicus curiae in support of Qassim; ACLU v. NSA; Howard v. Arkansas - represented Matthew Lee Howard and other plaintiffs; 2007 Morse v.