Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
"Who's Afraid of Peer Review?" is an article written by Science correspondent John Bohannon that describes his investigation of peer review among fee-charging open-access journals. Between January and August 2013, Bohannon submitted fake scientific papers to 304 journals owned by fee-charging open access publishers.
Discipline Year Description Chemistry: 2013 "Who's Afraid of Peer Review?": In 2013 John Bohannon wrote in Science about a "sting operation" he conducted in which he submitted "a credible but mundane scientific paper, one with such grave errors that a competent peer reviewer should easily identify it as flawed and unpublishable", to 304 open-access publishers.
John Bohannon is an American science journalist and scientist who is Director of Science at Primer, an artificial intelligence company headquartered in San Francisco, California. [1] He is known for his career prior to Primer as a science journalist and Harvard University biologist, [ 3 ] most notably with his "Gonzo Scientist" online series at ...
In 2013, John Bohannon, a staff writer for the journal Science and for popular science publications, tested the open-access system by submitting to a number of such journals a deeply flawed paper on the purported effect of a lichen constituent, and published the results in a paper called, "Who's Afraid of Peer Review?".
In 2013, Science correspondent John Bohannon submitted 304 fake scientific articles to various open access journals, many of which were published by publishers on Beall's List. Among these publishers that completed the review process, 82% accepted the paper.
The article was accepted without peer review by the journal's CEO, Carlos Vasquez, who called the manuscript "outstanding" and published it without any change for a fee of €600. [2] The journal editors later said that the article hadn't been accepted and was posted on the journal website only "for some hours", while Bohannon produced previous ...
All research articles in International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education undergo a stringent peer review process, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two undisclosed referees. [2] A paper that explicitly deals with the 'peer review process' as opposed to the 'editing process'. [3]
The publication, entitled Who's Afraid of Peer Review?, concluded that Beall is "good at spotting publishers with poor quality control". Of publishers on his list that completed the review process, it was accepted by 82%. [25] Beall remarked that the author of the sting, John Bohannon, "basically found what I've been saying for years". [27]