enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Loving v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

    Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  3. Mildred and Richard Loving - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_and_Richard_Loving

    The Lovings and ACLU appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Lovings did not attend the oral arguments in Washington, but their lawyer, Bernard S. Cohen, conveyed a message from Richard Loving to the court: "[T]ell the Court I love my wife, and it is just unfair that I can't live with her in Virginia." [21] The case, Loving v.

  4. Obergefell v. Hodges - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obergefell_v._Hodges

    The U.S. Supreme Court case of Obergefell v. Hodges is not the culmination of one lawsuit. [8] Ultimately, it is the consolidation of six lower-court cases, originally representing sixteen same-sex couples, seven of their children, a widower, an adoption agency, and a funeral director. Those cases came from Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and ...

  5. The heartbreaking love story behind the historic Obergefell v ...

    www.aol.com/news/heartbreaking-love-story-behind...

    Hodges Supreme Court case. ... Hodges Supreme Court ruling in 2015 that guaranteed the legal right for same-sex couples to get married, there is a love story behind the legal documents.

  6. Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_ex_rel._Gaines_v...

    The Supreme Court did not overturn Plessy v. Ferguson or violate the "separate but equal" precedents, but began to concede the difficulty and near-impossibility of a state maintaining segregated Black and white institutions that could never be truly equal. This case helped forge the legal framework for Brown v.

  7. Pace v. Alabama - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pace_v._Alabama

    Pace v. Alabama, 106 U.S. 583 (1883), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court affirmed that Alabama's anti-miscegenation statute was constitutional. [1] This ruling was rejected by the Supreme Court in 1964 in McLaughlin v. Florida and in 1967 in Loving v. Virginia. Pace v.

  8. The biggest Supreme Court decisions of 2024: From ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/biggest-supreme-court-decisions-2024...

    The ruling reversed a lower court decision, which the justices said swept too broadly into areas like peaceful but disruptive conduct, and returned the case to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

  9. McLaughlin v. Florida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLaughlin_v._Florida

    McLaughlin v. Florida, 379 U.S. 184 (1964), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a cohabitation law of Florida, part of the state's anti-miscegenation laws, was unconstitutional. [1] The law prohibited habitual cohabitation by two unmarried people of opposite sex, if one was black and the other was white.