Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
During oral arguments on April 22, 2024, Theane Evangelis of the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher argued the case on behalf of Grants Pass. Evangelis asserted that homeless people should be forced to make a necessity defense in court rather than challenging the local government's ability to enforce anti-camping ordinances on Eighth Amendment ...
Decisions that do not note an argument date were decided without oral argument. ... City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, 603 U.S. 520: April 22, 2024: June 28, 2024: 57
Oral argument A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools: 24-249: Whether the ADA and Rehabilitation Act require children with disabilities to satisfy a uniquely stringent "bad faith or gross misjudgment" standard when seeking relief for discrimination relating to their education. January 17, 2025 (April 28, 2025) Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Kennedy ...
Now's your chance.On Monday, the Supreme Court is set to hear arguments over the phone for the first time ever due to the coronavirus pandemic; they'll hear 10 cases remotely from now until May 13.
(Reuters) -Alphabet's Google asked a U.S. appeals court on Wednesday to throw out a jury verdict and a judge's order forcing it to revamp its app store Play. In its first detailed argument to the ...
Griffin declined USA TODAY's request for comment, saying it would be, "a violation of our Judicial Code of Conduct," to do so. ... D.C., following oral arguments in Moore v. Harper, a Republican ...
One notable controversy which occurred during oral arguments was a response Trump attorney John Sauer made to Sonia Sotomayor which argued Presidents can, among other things, kill political rivals with immunity. [48] Trump attorneys cited Nixon v. Fitzgerald to support Trump's argument, while Smith attorneys cited United States v.
Plus: Donald Trump responds to prosecutors on the presidential immunity question and the House GOP isn’t finished with Hunter Biden.