Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, the union of three sets A, B, and C contains all elements of A, all elements of B, and all elements of C, and nothing else. Thus, x is an element of A ∪ B ∪ C if and only if x is in at least one of A, B, and C. A finite union is the union of a finite number of sets; the phrase does not imply that the union set is a finite set ...
The algebra of sets is the set-theoretic analogue of the algebra of numbers. Just as arithmetic addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, so are set union and intersection; just as the arithmetic relation "less than or equal" is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, so is the set relation of "subset".
For example, "is a blood relative of" is a symmetric relation, because x is a blood relative of y if and only if y is a blood relative of x. Antisymmetric for all x, y ∈ X, if xRy and yRx then x = y. For example, ≥ is an antisymmetric relation; so is >, but vacuously (the condition in the definition is always false). [11] Asymmetric
Lawson-Perfect's approach is to represent each part of a question as a function of the answer to the previous part. That is, if a student answer's "x" for part a, the correct answer to part b is "f(x)." No matter what the student puts for part a, the corresponding answer for part b can be calculated quickly.
It is easy to show that if a union-closed family contains a singleton {} (as in the example above), then the element must occur in at least half of the sets of the family. If there is a counterexample to the conjecture, then there is also a counterexample consisting only of finite sets. Therefore, without loss of generality, we will assume that ...
The axiom of replacement allows one to form many unions, such as the union of two sets. However, in its full generality, the axiom of union is independent from the rest of the ZFC-axioms: [citation needed] Replacement does not prove the existence of the union of a set of sets if the result contains an unbounded number of cardinalities.
A term's definition may require additional properties that are not listed in this table. This Hasse diagram depicts a partially ordered set with four elements: a , b , the maximal element a ∨ {\displaystyle \vee } b equal to the join of a and b , and the minimal element a ∧ {\displaystyle \wedge } b equal to the meet of a and b .
In mathematics, a structure on a set (or on some sets) refers to providing it (or them) with certain additional features (e.g. an operation, relation, metric, or topology). Τhe additional features are attached or related to the set (or to the sets), so as to provide it (or them) with some additional meaning or significance.