enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Automobile_Workers...

    United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 499 U.S. 187 (1991), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States establishing that private sector policies prohibiting women from knowingly working in potentially hazardous occupations are discriminatory and in violation of Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. [1]

  3. Pregnancy Discrimination Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_Discrimination_Act

    The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–555) is a United States federal statute. It amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to "prohibit sex discrimination on the basis of pregnancy." [1] [2] The Act covers discrimination "on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions."

  4. General Electric Co. v. Gilbert - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_Co._v...

    General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125 (1976), is a 1976 United States Supreme Court case authored by Chief Justice William Rehnquist concerning gender-based discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that pregnancy could reasonably be excluded from an employer's the disability ...

  5. Pregnancy discrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_discrimination

    According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission website, between the years of 2011 and 2014 there were forty-four cases filed for violating the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. The most common patterns of the violations often included:

  6. California Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Guerra

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Federal_Savings...

    § 12945(b)(2) is not preempted by Title VII, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, because it is not inconsistent with the purposes of Title VII, nor does it require the doing of an act that is unlawful under Title VII. Court membership; Chief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White

  7. US employers must accommodate abortions, birth control ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-employers-must-accommodate...

    U.S. employers' obligation to accommodate workers' pregnancies also extends to abortions and the use of contraception, the U.S. agency that enforces workplace discrimination laws said on Monday.

  8. Employment discrimination law in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_discrimination...

    The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII in 1978, specifying that unlawful sex discrimination includes discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]

  9. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Employment...

    [8] Discrimination complaints can be based on hiring, firing, promotions, harassment, training, wages, and/or benefits, [9] and responsibility covers: [10] Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Sections 102 and 103 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991; Pregnancy Discrimination Act; Equal Pay Act of 1963; Title I of the Americans with ...