enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Logical disjunction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction

    Because the logical or means a disjunction formula is true when either one or both of its parts are true, it is referred to as an inclusive disjunction. This is in contrast with an exclusive disjunction, which is true when one or the other of the arguments are true, but not both (referred to as exclusive or, or XOR).

  3. Disjunctive syllogism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_syllogism

    The name "disjunctive syllogism" derives from its being a syllogism, a three-step argument, and the use of a logical disjunction (any "or" statement.) For example, "P or Q" is a disjunction, where P and Q are called the statement's disjuncts. The rule makes it possible to eliminate a disjunction from a logical proof. It is the rule that

  4. Material implication (rule of inference) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_implication_(rule...

    In propositional logic, material implication [1] [2] is a valid rule of replacement that allows a conditional statement to be replaced by a disjunction in which the antecedent is negated. The rule states that P implies Q is logically equivalent to not-or and that either form can replace the other in logical proofs.

  5. Disjunctive normal form - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_normal_form

    In boolean logic, a disjunctive normal form (DNF) is a canonical normal form of a logical formula consisting of a disjunction of conjunctions; it can also be described as an OR of ANDs, a sum of products, or — in philosophical logic — a cluster concept. [1] As a normal form, it is useful in automated theorem proving.

  6. Affirming a disjunct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_a_disjunct

    Venn diagram for "A or B", with inclusive or (OR) Venn diagram for "A or B", with exclusive or (XOR). The fallacy lies in concluding that one disjunct must be false because the other disjunct is true; in fact they may both be true because "or" is defined inclusively rather than exclusively.

  7. Conjunction/disjunction duality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunction/disjunction...

    For example, the dual of (A & B ∨ C) would be (¬A ∨ ¬B & ¬C). The dual of a formula φ is notated as φ*. The Duality Principle states that in classical propositional logic, any sentence is equivalent to the negation of its dual. [4] [7] Duality Principle: For all φ, we have that φ = ¬(φ*). [4] [7] Proof: By induction on complexity ...

  8. 12 Logic Puzzles That Will Test Your Smarts - AOL

    www.aol.com/12-logic-puzzles-test-smarts...

    Like some of the hardest math puzzles and math riddles, these puzzles can get very complex. If you look for them online, you’ll find lots of examples of logic puzzles that come with grids to ...

  9. Disjunction elimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunction_elimination

    In propositional logic, disjunction elimination [1] [2] (sometimes named proof by cases, case analysis, or or elimination) is the valid argument form and rule of inference that allows one to eliminate a disjunctive statement from a logical proof.