enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shareholder oppression - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder_oppression

    Shareholder oppression occurs when the majority shareholders in a corporation take action that unfairly prejudices the minority. It most commonly occurs in non-publicly traded companies, because the lack of a public market for shares leaves minority shareholders particularly vulnerable, since minority shareholders cannot escape mistreatment by selling their stock and exiting the corporation. [1]

  3. Blocking minority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_minority

    The Companies Act 2006 in the United Kingdom gives minority shareholders certain rights. Minority shareholder protections in United States corporate law may amount to a blocking minority. Voting in the Council of the European Union uses 'qualified majority voting', which means that a significant minority of countries and populations may block a ...

  4. Oppression remedy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppression_remedy

    In corporate law in Commonwealth countries, an oppression remedy is a statutory right available to oppressed shareholders.It empowers the shareholders to bring an action against the corporation in which they own shares when the conduct of the company has an effect that is oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, or unfairly disregards the interests of a shareholder.

  5. Foss v Harbottle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foss_v_Harbottle

    Because Foss v Harbottle leaves the minority in an unprotected position, exceptions have arisen and statutory provisions have come into being which provide some protection for the minority. By far and away the most important protection is the unfair prejudice action in ss. 994-6 of the Companies Act 2006 (UK) (s 232 Corporations Act 2001 in ...

  6. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. United States corporate law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_corporate_law

    Citron v Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp., 569 A.2d 53, 70 (Del. 1989) non-controlling shareholders do not owe duties to minority shareholders and may vote their shares for personal gain without concern; In re Cysive, Inc. Shareholders Litigation 836 A.2d 531 (Del. 2003) Nelson Carbonell owned 35% of Cysive, Inc., a publicly traded company ...

  8. Derivative suit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_suit

    Shareholder derivative suits permit a shareholder to initiate a suit when management has failed to do so. To enable a diversity of management approaches to risks and reinforce the most common forms of corporate rules with a high degree of permissible management power, many jurisdictions have implemented minimum thresholds and grounds ...

  9. Judge in hush money trial threatens Trump with jail after ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-holds-trump-contempt...

    The judge in Donald Trump’s hush money case held the former president in criminal contempt over posts on Truth Social that he said violated a gag order barring any attacks on jurors and ...