enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fazaga - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Bureau_of...

    The FBI filed a petition for a writ of certiorari that asked the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit's ruling and resolve the question regarding FISA Section 1806(f). The FBI stated that the specific FISA section only applied when the case dealt with charging a specific individual, and did not apply to a general challenge to their ...

  3. Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_prosecution_of...

    [3] For a time in the early history of the country, corrupt public officials could be charged with the common law crimes related to corruption; such crimes could continue to be charged in the D.C. circuit court, where the laws of Maryland and Virginia remained in force, even after the Supreme Court's decision abolishing federal common law ...

  4. United States v. O'Hagan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._O'Hagan

    O'Hagan, 521 U.S. 642 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning insider trading and breach of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10(b) and 10(b)-5. In an opinion written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg , the Court held that an individual may be found liable for violating Rule 10(b)-5 by misappropriating confidential ...

  5. Herring v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herring_v._United_States

    Ohio (1961), the Supreme Court created the exclusionary rule, which generally operates to suppress – i.e. prevent the introduction at trial of – evidence obtained in violation of Constitutional rights. "Suppression of evidence, however, has always been [the court's] last resort, not [its] first impulse.

  6. Justices rule Muslim men can sue FBI agents over no-fly list

    www.aol.com/justices-rule-muslim-men-sue...

    A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Muslim men who were placed on the government’s no-fly list because they refused to serve as FBI informants can seek to hold federal agents ...

  7. Ashcroft v. Iqbal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashcroft_v._Iqbal

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that plaintiffs must present a "plausible" cause of action. Alongside Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (and together known as Twiqbal), Iqbal raised the threshold which plaintiffs needed to meet.

  8. U.S. Supreme Court to rule on major cases in 2025 - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/u-supreme-court-rule-major...

    (The Center Square) – The U.S. Supreme Court has released a string of landmark rulings recently, from sending the abortion issue back to the states to granting a measure of presidential immunity ...

  9. When the Supreme Court issued its code of conduct, just a few months after the Associated Press expose, it included an entirely novel provision in Canon 4A, that is found in no other court’s code.