Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Relevance feedback is a feature of some information retrieval systems. The idea behind relevance feedback is to take the results that are initially returned from a given query, to gather user feedback, and to use information about whether or not those results are relevant to perform a new query. We can usefully distinguish between three types ...
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – a style guideline that "sets out advice on... how to make an article clear, precise and relevant to the reader." (italics added) Wikipedia:Relevance emerges; Wikipedia:Relevance of content; Wikipedia:What claims of relevance are false; Wikipedia:Indirect relevance is sometimes OK; Related essays Wikipedia ...
The information retrieval community has emphasized the use of test collections and benchmark tasks to measure topical relevance, starting with the Cranfield Experiments of the early 1960s and culminating in the TREC evaluations that continue to this day as the main evaluation framework for information retrieval research.
2.1 Practical realities of "relevancy" in Wikipedia. 2.2 Guiding principles. 2.2.1 Content must be about the subject of the article.
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... This template shows project space pages to do with relevance and scope; mainly essays and policy pages. ... Wikipedia® is a ...
What links here; Upload file; Special pages; Printable version; Page information; Get shortened URL; Download QR code
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 98 KB, MIME type: application/pdf) This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons . Information from its description page there is shown below.
On Wikipedia, relevance is simply whether a fact is in the right article, based on whether it pertains to the article's subject. Usually this is obvious. Usually this is obvious. When not obvious, relevance is decided by the editors of the article, based on what is considered likely to be useful to readers.