Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court on July 1, 2024, kept on hold efforts by Texas and Florida to limit how Facebook, TikTok, X, YouTube and other social media platforms regulate content in a ruling that strongly ...
The U.S. Justice Department asked a federal appeals court to reinstate the convictions of a former Fox executive and a South American sports media and marketing company in the FIFA bribery ...
Matthew Fox. Updated January 6, 2025 at 7:29 AM. Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg. A recent Supreme Court ruling may slow down President-elect Donald Trump's deregulation plans. ... USA TODAY Sports.
Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 567 U.S. 239 (2012), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding whether the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's scheme for regulating speech is unconstitutionally vague.
Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502 (2009), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld regulations of the Federal Communications Commission that ban "fleeting expletives" on television broadcasts, finding they were not arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. [1]
Trump's team asked the Supreme Court to reject the expedited timeline and allow the appeals court to consider the case first. [29] [30] On December 22, the Supreme Court denied the special counsel's request, leaving the case to the appeals court. [31] On January 9, 2024, the D.C. Court of Appeals heard arguments in the immunity dispute.
The ruling came in U.S. District Court Eastern District of Kentucky Northern Division in Cardona v. Tennessee on Tuesday. Tennessee on Tuesday. Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us