enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Matal v. Tam - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matal_v._Tam

    Matal v. Tam, 582 U.S. 218 (2017) (previously known as Lee v.Tam) is a Supreme Court of the United States case that affirmed unanimously the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that the provisions of the Lanham Act prohibiting registration of trademarks that may "disparage" persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols with the United States Patent and ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court trademark case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    A trademark owner who confines his trademark usage to a certain territory cannot enjoin use of that trademark by someone else who in good faith established extensive and continuous trade in another territory where the plaintiff trademark owner's product is unknown. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co. 248 U.S. 90: Dec. 9, 1918: Substantive

  4. Opposition proceeding - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_proceeding

    The trademark applicant and opponent then submit pleadings, evidence and arguments to the Trademarks Opposition Board (an administrative body within CIPO), which hears and makes decisions in opposition proceedings. [3] [4] [5] The Board can either refuse the trademark application (in whole or in part) or reject the opposition. [4]

  5. Supreme Court appears inclined to refuse ‘Trump too small ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-appears-inclined...

    A California man’s chances of trademarking “Trump too small” may be gone. The Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared inclined to side with the Biden Justice Department in rejecting the ...

  6. Fair use (U.S. trademark law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use_(U.S._trademark_law)

    Fair use of trademarks is more limited than that which exists in the context of copyright. Many trademarks are adapted from words or symbols that are common to the culture, as Apple, Inc. using a trademark that is based upon the apple. Other trademarks are invented by the mark owner (such as Kodak) and have no common use until introduced by the ...

  7. Trademark infringement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_infringement

    The Supreme Court first held that liability for trademark infringement could extend beyond direct infringers in Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. [28] The Supreme Court articulated the following standard for contributory infringement: "If a manufacturer or distributor intentionally induces another to infringe a trademark, or ...

  8. Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiffany_(NJ)_Inc._v._eBay_Inc.

    Tiffany claimed the contributory trademark infringement of eBay, which was a judicially constructed doctrine articulated by the Supreme Court in Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. and found the liability for trademark infringement can extend beyond those who actually mislabel goods with the mark of another. As established in ...

  9. United States trademark law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_trademark_law

    A trademark is a word, phrase, or logo that identifies the source of goods or services. [1] Trademark law protects a business' commercial identity or brand by discouraging other businesses from adopting a name or logo that is "confusingly similar" to an existing trademark. The goal is to allow consumers to easily identify the producers of goods ...