Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
However, much of the content on Wikipedia is itself referenced, so an alternative is to cite the reliable source rather than the article itself. A wiki is a non-traditional medium, and as such doesn't conform well to the usual book-citation formats. Wiki is not paper, so you will need to use an electronic-citation format instead. The exact ...
Wikipedia pages often cite reliable secondary sources that vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you ought be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or "middle-page" in this case).
A general reference is a citation to a reliable source that supports content, but is not linked to any particular text in the article through an inline citation. General references are usually listed at the end of the article in a "References" section, and are usually sorted by the last name of the author or the editor.
This also means that Wikipedia is not the place for original work, archival findings that have not been published, or evidence from any source that has not been published. An example of usage in a published source is not of itself valid as a citation, because your selection of that example constitutes original work.
Reference Organizer presents all references in graphical user interface, where you can choose whether the references should be defined in the body of article or in the reference list template(s) (list-defined format). You can also sort the references in various ways (and optionally keep the sort order), and rename the references.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea.
Wikipedia should be considered to be like a library rather than a single source. Just because a book is in the library does not mean the book is a reliable source, and conversely, just because a book in the library is unreliable does not mean the entire library is unreliable [11]. Thus, a poor article from Wikipedia should not prompt academics ...
Reference spamming occurs when an editor adds the same citation multiple places in an article where it is unnecessary or does not verify the claim. Moreover, failed verification spamming occurs when more than one citation is used to try to convince others the claim is sourced when the sources presented does not verify the claim.