enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Doomsday argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_argument

    The doomsday argument (DA), or Carter catastrophe, is a probabilistic argument that claims to predict the future population of the human species based on an estimation of the number of humans born to date. The doomsday argument was originally proposed by the astrophysicist Brandon Carter in 1983, [1] leading to the initial name of the Carter ...

  3. Robin Hanson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hanson

    Hanson received a BS in physics from the University of California, Irvine in 1981, an MS in physics and an MA in Conceptual Foundations of Science from the University of Chicago in 1984, and a PhD in social science from Caltech in 1997 for his thesis titled Four puzzles in information and politics: Product bans, informed voters, social insurance, and persistent disagreement. [6]

  4. Self-referencing doomsday argument rebuttal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-referencing_doomsday...

    If the doomsday argument can apply to itself it can be simultaneously right (as a probabilistic argument) and probably wrong (as a prediction).. Therefore, Landsberg and Dewynne argue that it is more likely that the doomsday argument is wrong (even if its logic is correct) than that the human race will become extinct in 9,000 years (which the doomsday argument calculates at around 95% likely).

  5. Self-indication assumption doomsday argument rebuttal

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-Indication_Assumption...

    The self-indication assumption doomsday argument rebuttal is an objection to the doomsday argument (that there is only a 5% chance of more than twenty times the historic number of humans ever being born) by arguing that the chance of being born is not one, but is an increasing function of the number of people who will be born.

  6. J. Richard Gott - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Richard_Gott

    He made a major effort subsequently to defend his form of the Doomsday argument from a variety of philosophical attacks, and this debate (like the feasibility of closed time loops) is still ongoing. To popularize the Copernicus method, Gott gave The New Yorker magazine a 95% confidence interval for the closing time of forty-four Broadway and ...

  7. 10 Reasons Why Every American Woman Should Vote In November

    testkitchen.huffingtonpost.com/our-vote-counts

    This underrepresentation makes our political participation even more imperative. To that end, HuffPost Women has partnered with Rock The Vote, and more than 50 other women's media brands for a cross-brand effort to encourage and help women across the country to register to vote. Because, quite simply, #OurVoteCounts.

  8. Timeline of women's legal rights in the United States (other ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women's_legal...

    Florida: Mary R. Grizzle introduces and passes the Married Women Property Rights Act, giving married women in Florida, for the first time, the right to own property solely in their names and to transfer that property without their husbands' signatures. [136] 1971. Barring women from practicing law becomes prohibited. [137]

  9. William Eckhardt (trader) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Eckhardt_(trader)

    In 1993, Eckhardt's article "Probability Theory and the Doomsday Argument" was published in the philosophical journal Mind. [1] His follow-up article, "A Shooting-Room view of Doomsday" was published in The Journal of Philosophy in 1997. Both articles make arguments skeptical of the Doomsday Argument as formulated by John Leslie.