Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Port Huron, use or possession of e-cigarettes, Vapor Products, or Alternative Nicotine Products by minors is a misdemeanor. Also prohibited is the sale or furnishing of said items to minors. Smoking for any purposes outside of the cooking of food is not allowed in city parks or beaches.
When the eighth-grade girl arrived at Eastlake Middle School in Lake County on Sept. 7, another student approached the girl, asking if she wanted to smoke a new vape pen, the girl’s mother said ...
Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution allows states to outlaw the possession, as distinct from the distribution, of child pornography. [1] In doing so, the Court extended the holding of New York v.
STURGEON BAY - A Baileys Harbor man and real estate developer is facing as much as 250 years in prison and $1 million in fines after he was charged with 10 counts of possession of child pornography.
In a separate case involving the FDA, the Supreme Court on Dec. 2 is set to hear arguments over the agency's denial of applications to sell flavored vape products. (Reporting by John Kruzel ...
Adverse possession in common law, and the related civil law concept of usucaption (also acquisitive prescription or prescriptive acquisition), are legal mechanisms under which a person who does not have legal title to a piece of property, usually real property, may acquire legal ownership based on continuous possession or occupation without the permission of its legal owner.
The student falsely claimed that bombs had been planted inside of a middle school and high school in Ohio 3rd Grader Faces Criminal Charge After Making Multiple School Bomb Threats on Facebook ...
United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal statute prohibiting the "pandering" of child pornography [1] (offering or requesting to transfer, sell, deliver, or trade the items) did not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if a person charged under the code did in fact not possess child ...